|
1
|
- TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER AND TECHNOLOGY CLINICS
- Helsinki 8. May 2003
- Tekes, National Technology Agency of Finland
- Juha Suuronen
|
|
2
|
- Finland
- Tekes
- Budgeted Tekes funding for applied and industrial R&D
- Base for Technology Transfer in Finland
- Tekes Technology Clinics
- Workflow in a Technology Clinic
- Strenghts and Weaknesses
- The Future of the Technology Transfer in Tekes
|
|
3
|
|
|
4
|
- Tekes’ primary objective is to promote the
competitiveness of Finnish industry and
the service sector by technological means.
- Tekes is headquartered in Helsinki. Tekes has 14 regional units
throughout Finland. In total, 315 people is working for Tekes.
- Four Tekes offices abroad: Brussels, Tokyo, San Jose, Silicon Valley and
Washington D.C.
|
|
5
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
8
|
- Overview
- Technology Clinic is a set actors consisting of coordinator, service
providers, Tekes and SMEs in need of know-how and technology
- Main goal of the initiative is to promote adaptation of specified
technologies for problem solving in SMEs in order to introduce new
technological possibilities and to raise their awareness of external
R&D resources.
- Technology Clinics are focused and selective in terms of technology
themes
- Each clinic is in operation 2…3 years
|
|
9
|
- Matchmaker between research institutes/universities and companies not
familiar dealing with researchers
- Access to the best experts in the country
- New customers for research institutions
- Rapid and flexible way to finance smallish problems
|
|
10
|
- Average costs around 12,000 euros, half paid by Tekes and half by the
commissioning company
- Technology Clinic Initiative was launched in 1992. 30 Technology Clinics
in operation since the initiative was launched and some 850 assignments
so far.
- All together 10 million € used, 5 million € of that granted by Tekes.
- Examples of clinics: Machine vision, Rapid prototyping, Noise and
vibration, Food hygiene, Wood drying, Technology strategy for
construction industry, Simulation etc.
|
|
11
|
- Setting up a clinic
- Choosing the theme (suggested by Tekes, research institute, university,
company…). Marketing study in SMEs if needed.
- Choosing the coordinator, service providers and Tekes contact person
- And when the clinic has been set up
- Marketing, brochures, seminars, newspapers…
- Suitable problem in SME –contact to any party
- Closer look at the problem
- Offer from service provider to the SME
- Approval of the assingment by Tekes
- Agreement between parties
- Work
- Company gets the results
- Customer will be charged 50 % of the price and Tekes will pay another 50
%
|
|
12
|
- Strenghts
- Reduced bureaucracy in funding application process
- Rapid assingment approval and execution
- Flexible themes and organisation
- Effective tool for technology diffusion such as results cumulated in a
national technology program
- Weaknesses
- Consept is rather push than pull operated => the theme and time
window doesn’t meet all actual technological needs in SMEs
- Marketing is time consuming and hit rate is low
- Insufficient general awareness of technology clinics –what is a
technology clinic and what clinics are ongoing at the moment?
- Challenges in SMEs
- Constrains: Lack of time, resources and money
- Multi problem environment –identifying focal problems
- Requirements for investment’s pay-off period are tight
- Tendency to do the R&D itself (learning by doing), not purchase
|
|
13
|
- Development Project in Tekes during spring 2003
- Possible changes
- Themes => liberalization => more pull operated
- and at the same time broader time window for themes
- Assingnment application process more systematic
- More systematic way to diffuse results gained in a national technology
programs
- More visibility in regions and regional needs taken into account (i.e.
in polytechnics)
|
|
14
|
|